Blog Feeds
08-29 08:11 AM
Many of our clients have been crying tears of joy because of the September Visa Bulletin. The best news is the advance in the family-based 2A category. Just one year ago, the wait exceeded five years. Now, the wait is down to just 8 months! This is very important to persons who were granted green cards under the EB-3 category before the retrogression, and who have been waiting for years for their spouses/children to �follow to join� them. Last week, I spoke to a nurse who got her green card in 2007 based on her 2006 EB-3 priority date. She...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/08/the-family-2a-category-rocks.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/08/the-family-2a-category-rocks.html)
wallpaper The Moment: Pick of the Bad
suave100
01-30 10:50 AM
I am currently on H1B and in the process of leaving my current employer XYZ Inc. I also have an EAD that I haven't used yet but plan to use going forward. I understand that XYZ will and is rather obligated to notify USCIS of termination of my H1B employment by virtue of which, USICS will take steps to revoke the H1B petition. That being said,
1. Will I (beneficiary) and / or XYZ (petitioner) will receive a notice saying my H1B petition has been revoked?
2. Will it help in any shape or form if I were to fill an (back dated) I-9 form with XYZ indicating that I was already on EAD with XYZ before my termination? In this case, is XYZ still obligated to notify USCIS of termination of my H1B employment?
3. What constitutes a "bona fide termination" and is this even applicable in my case? Should I have a formal resignation letter in place for audit / RFE purposes down the road, if any?
1. Will I (beneficiary) and / or XYZ (petitioner) will receive a notice saying my H1B petition has been revoked?
2. Will it help in any shape or form if I were to fill an (back dated) I-9 form with XYZ indicating that I was already on EAD with XYZ before my termination? In this case, is XYZ still obligated to notify USCIS of termination of my H1B employment?
3. What constitutes a "bona fide termination" and is this even applicable in my case? Should I have a formal resignation letter in place for audit / RFE purposes down the road, if any?
pomosideshow
03-22 03:38 PM
From My webcomic (http://www.postmodernsideshow.com/category/comics/) [postmodernsideshow.com]
Drawn by hand on a wacom enabled laptop in ps and then vectorized in ai.
Ignore the mysterious thumb pinky on my right hand.
I've lost weight since the drawing, but I still draw myself with the paunch.
http://www.postmodernsideshow.com/comics/2008-05-26-gc0097-baby-food-shame.png
Drawn by hand on a wacom enabled laptop in ps and then vectorized in ai.
Ignore the mysterious thumb pinky on my right hand.
I've lost weight since the drawing, but I still draw myself with the paunch.
http://www.postmodernsideshow.com/comics/2008-05-26-gc0097-baby-food-shame.png
2011 cameron diaz bad teacher maxim
kak1978
03-01 10:34 AM
You have to contact a Immigration lawyer. The scope of this forum is only for people who have a pending Legal Immigration status.
more...
rpulipati
11-02 09:18 PM
It has to be receipt date FIFO, but can never say how USCIS will processes.
With my experience from Backlog Elimination Center's, USCIS works using a pure random function that gets seeded randomly from congress.
Please let me know if 140 processing times is based on receipt date or notice date?
I'm a concurrent 140-485 filer, filed on July 2 2007. My notice date on I-140 says August 16, 2007, where as my friend who filed only140 on july 2 has Notice date of july 12. Does that mean his will be processed first?
With my experience from Backlog Elimination Center's, USCIS works using a pure random function that gets seeded randomly from congress.
Please let me know if 140 processing times is based on receipt date or notice date?
I'm a concurrent 140-485 filer, filed on July 2 2007. My notice date on I-140 says August 16, 2007, where as my friend who filed only140 on july 2 has Notice date of july 12. Does that mean his will be processed first?
berryberry6
12-15 07:57 AM
Candidates already in the US may, if they are on a non-immigrant visa (such as a B1/B2 visit visa), be able to apply to the BCIS for adjustment (if changing to immigrant) or change (if changing to other non-immigrant) of status while remaining in the US. This option is not open to candidates who are present in the US under the visa-waiver scheme. Also, if the candidate did not advise of the possibility of a change of status to the relevant US Embassy or Consulate beforehand, USCIS may be reluctant to permit an application for adjustment of status.
Tummy Tuck Complications (http://tummytuckguide.com/tummytuckcomplications.php)
Scanning Stages (http://labface.com/suppliers/Scanning-Stages-191)
Tummy Tuck Complications (http://tummytuckguide.com/tummytuckcomplications.php)
Scanning Stages (http://labface.com/suppliers/Scanning-Stages-191)
more...
kramac01
08-11 09:13 PM
Hello,
I am a brain cancer patient. If something happens to me, Would my wife and children continue to get the GC?
I have filed my I 485 in July 2007. My priority date is Sept 2003 (EB3). My wife has EAD and she is working.
I would really appreciate if somebody replies.
Thanks,
Ram.
I am a brain cancer patient. If something happens to me, Would my wife and children continue to get the GC?
I have filed my I 485 in July 2007. My priority date is Sept 2003 (EB3). My wife has EAD and she is working.
I would really appreciate if somebody replies.
Thanks,
Ram.
2010 Maybe it#39;s seeing Cameron Diaz
go2roomshare
03-10 10:24 PM
it is normal
more...
lokeymd
04-01 07:37 AM
I had already gotten my USDOS approval and my USCIS approval for my J waiver. The whole process took less than a month which surprised us! But it was stated on the I-797 that I should start working for my employer within 90days from March 19, which will be June 19. The problem is my training program does not end until June 30. Even if I wait until June 19 to file for my H1B, and if I don't go for premium processing, once they approve it and retro-date it, there will be an overlap from June 19-30. Can I apply for the H1 on June 30 instead (when my J expires) but that will be more than 90 days from March 19? I will appreciate any suggestions. Thanks!
hair Bad Teacher (Cameron Diaz.
kirupa
03-03 12:45 AM
Added!
more...
nightowl76
10-31 12:58 AM
Hello,
My I-485 was filed this July. My wife and I got FP notices for Nov 20. But my wife is currently in India and I will be in India too on Nov 20. So we will have to reschedule at least for my wife.
My question is, has anyone who filed their I-485 after July 2 rescheduled their FP appt and got a new appt date? I'm in the San Jose area.
Thanks in advance.
My I-485 was filed this July. My wife and I got FP notices for Nov 20. But my wife is currently in India and I will be in India too on Nov 20. So we will have to reschedule at least for my wife.
My question is, has anyone who filed their I-485 after July 2 rescheduled their FP appt and got a new appt date? I'm in the San Jose area.
Thanks in advance.
hot In tribute to Cameron Diaz#39;
ivar
02-09 10:40 PM
Immigration Trackers for USA Canada UK Australia (http://www..com)
more...
house Cameron Diaz Sizzles Maxim
Blog Feeds
02-05 06:40 PM
The week's news dealt a body-blow to the prospects for comprehensive immigration reform, as if the movement to fix our broken immigration laws were blind-sided in a collision with a former pinup driving a pickup -- which it was. With the election of new Massachusetts Senator, Scott Brown, to take the seat of the late Ted Kennedy, the godfather of more humane and just immigration laws, supporters of CIR (Comprehensive Immigration Reform) are swallowing their sadness and putting on their game faces, saying there's still no stopping the CIR train from arriving at its destination. It's hard to maintain optimism,...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/01/my-entry-1.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/01/my-entry-1.html)
tattoo cameron diaz bad teacher car
![cameron diaz bad teacher maxim. house [image] cameron diaz bad](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_v45u9xkPGHgBhSTSin6bBXAwoDt9x0qXwHL_QUm0BIXTxJyD3EEDof8jdoZ9Dm9k_vMyuUwWuMaP9yB1l0uooYtIGnGf3uDOdRUUzXE23_o5tx8VH4nJlUruKG8dlSiezLFef6413xrvB14KmIz4K7CztnxJH3m7yjXOn81ZgGF2qzEhEehsR0Or_OQUgWoUns8mwaLB70LXk=s0-d "house [image] cameron diaz bad")
ilikekilo
01-24 07:21 PM
nice gesture there
more...
pictures hot cameron diaz bad teacher
sunitha
01-21 01:46 AM
Hi All,
My EB3 RIR is filed on Feb 2005. Waiting for LC to clear. Also H1B expires on Jun 2007. Waiting for H1B extension for another 1 year.
I would like to change my job once I get my H1B extension.
1) Can I change my Job during my one year H1B extension when my LC is not cleared?
2) Can I use my current PD (Feb 2005) when my new Company process LC again through EB2 PERM?
3) From the new company, once I get LC through EB2 PERM, can I apply H1B extension for 3 years?
Please advice. Waiting for you reply.
Thanks,
Sunitha.
My EB3 RIR is filed on Feb 2005. Waiting for LC to clear. Also H1B expires on Jun 2007. Waiting for H1B extension for another 1 year.
I would like to change my job once I get my H1B extension.
1) Can I change my Job during my one year H1B extension when my LC is not cleared?
2) Can I use my current PD (Feb 2005) when my new Company process LC again through EB2 PERM?
3) From the new company, once I get LC through EB2 PERM, can I apply H1B extension for 3 years?
Please advice. Waiting for you reply.
Thanks,
Sunitha.
dresses diaz bad teacher maxim.
freddyCR
February 5th, 2005, 07:38 PM
Mangos...mostly ripe
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/mangosMedium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/mangosMedium.jpg
more...
makeup 2010 diaz bad teacher maxim.
octoberbloom
01-09 12:37 PM
I e-filed on october 20th.
Got RFE and RFE recieved by USCIS on 3rd december. No news after that :mad:
Got RFE and RFE recieved by USCIS on 3rd december. No news after that :mad:
girlfriend house [image] cameron diaz bad
felix31
01-16 10:11 PM
if you already have a prospective employer who will sponsor you, just fill out everything and have your lawyer ship the application april 1st.
hairstyles Movie Trailer: Bad Teacher
Macaca
07-23 07:32 PM
Reid's Anti-Reform Maneuvers (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/22/AR2007072200881.html?nav=hcmodule) By Robert D. Novak (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/robert+d.+novak/) Washington Post, July 23, 2007
When Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid picked up his ball and went home after his staged all-night session last week, he saved from possible embarrassment one of the least regular members of his Democratic caucus: Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska. Reform Republican Tom Coburn had ready an amendment to the defense authorization bill removing Nelson's earmark funding a Nebraska-based company whose officials include Nelson's son. Such an effort became impossible when Reid pulled the bill.
That Reid's action had this effect was mere coincidence. He knew that Sen. Carl Levin's amendment to the defense bill mandating a troop withdrawal from Iraq would fall short of the 60 votes needed to cut off debate, and Reid planned from the start to pull the bill after the all-night session, designed to satisfy antiwar zealots, was completed. But Reid is also working behind the scenes with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to undermine earmark transparency and prevent open debate on spending proposals such as Nelson's.
These antics fit the continuing decline of the Senate, including an unwritten rules change requiring 60 votes to pass any meaningful bill. When I arrived on Capitol Hill 50 years ago, Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson (like Reid today) had a slim Democratic majority and faced a Republican president, but he was not burdened with the 60-vote rule. While Johnson did use chicanery, Reid resorts to brute force that shatters the Senate's facade of civilized discourse. Reid is plotting to strip anti-earmark transparency from the final version of ethics legislation passed by the Senate and House, with tacit support from Republican senators and the GOP leadership.
At stake is the fate of Coburn's "Reid amendment," previously passed by the Senate and so called because it would bar earmarks benefiting a senator's family members such as Reid's four lobbyist sons and son-in-law. Nelson's current $7.5 million earmark for software helps 21st Century Systems Inc. (21CSI), which employs the senator's son, Patrick Nelson, as its marketing director. The company gets 80 percent of its funds from federal grants, mostly through earmarks. With nine offices scattered among states represented by appropriators in Congress, the company has in recent years spent $1.1 million to lobby Congress and $160,000 in congressional campaign contributions. "As of April," the Omaha World-Herald reported, "only one piece of [the company's] software has been used -- to help guard a single Marine camp in Iraq -- and it was no longer in use."
In requesting the 21CSI earmark, Nelson did not disclose his son's employment. "There's no requirement that he disclose that," a Nelson spokesman told this column. "But frankly, in this case, we didn't disclose it because it's so public." An April 24 letter from Levin giving senators instructions on how to request an earmark made no mention of the "Reid amendment" that had been passed by the Senate three months earlier but that required only certification that no senator's spouse would benefit from an earmark. Inclusion of Nelson's son, however, would be required if the ethics bill provision passes.
When the defense authorization bill came up last week, Coburn prepared amendments to eliminate the Nelson earmark and the most notorious earmark pending in Congress: Democratic Rep. John Murtha's proposed $23 million for the National Drug Intelligence Center in his Pennsylvania district. Reid's plan to satisfy antiwar activists with an all-night debate averted debate, for now, on those two earmarks.
Reid, the soft-spoken trial lawyer from Searchlight, Nev., has tended to suppress free expression in the World's Greatest Deliberative Body in his tumultuous 6 1/2 months as majority leader. Last week, he cut off an attempt by Sen. Arlen Specter, the veteran moderate Republican, to respond to him with an abruptness that I had not witnessed in a half-century of Senate watching. When Specter finally got the floor, he declared: "Nothing is done here until the majority leader decides to exercise his power to keep the Senate in all night on a meaningless, insulting session. . . . Last night's performance made us the laughingstock of the world." It may get worse if plans to eviscerate ethics legislation are pursued.
When Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid picked up his ball and went home after his staged all-night session last week, he saved from possible embarrassment one of the least regular members of his Democratic caucus: Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska. Reform Republican Tom Coburn had ready an amendment to the defense authorization bill removing Nelson's earmark funding a Nebraska-based company whose officials include Nelson's son. Such an effort became impossible when Reid pulled the bill.
That Reid's action had this effect was mere coincidence. He knew that Sen. Carl Levin's amendment to the defense bill mandating a troop withdrawal from Iraq would fall short of the 60 votes needed to cut off debate, and Reid planned from the start to pull the bill after the all-night session, designed to satisfy antiwar zealots, was completed. But Reid is also working behind the scenes with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to undermine earmark transparency and prevent open debate on spending proposals such as Nelson's.
These antics fit the continuing decline of the Senate, including an unwritten rules change requiring 60 votes to pass any meaningful bill. When I arrived on Capitol Hill 50 years ago, Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson (like Reid today) had a slim Democratic majority and faced a Republican president, but he was not burdened with the 60-vote rule. While Johnson did use chicanery, Reid resorts to brute force that shatters the Senate's facade of civilized discourse. Reid is plotting to strip anti-earmark transparency from the final version of ethics legislation passed by the Senate and House, with tacit support from Republican senators and the GOP leadership.
At stake is the fate of Coburn's "Reid amendment," previously passed by the Senate and so called because it would bar earmarks benefiting a senator's family members such as Reid's four lobbyist sons and son-in-law. Nelson's current $7.5 million earmark for software helps 21st Century Systems Inc. (21CSI), which employs the senator's son, Patrick Nelson, as its marketing director. The company gets 80 percent of its funds from federal grants, mostly through earmarks. With nine offices scattered among states represented by appropriators in Congress, the company has in recent years spent $1.1 million to lobby Congress and $160,000 in congressional campaign contributions. "As of April," the Omaha World-Herald reported, "only one piece of [the company's] software has been used -- to help guard a single Marine camp in Iraq -- and it was no longer in use."
In requesting the 21CSI earmark, Nelson did not disclose his son's employment. "There's no requirement that he disclose that," a Nelson spokesman told this column. "But frankly, in this case, we didn't disclose it because it's so public." An April 24 letter from Levin giving senators instructions on how to request an earmark made no mention of the "Reid amendment" that had been passed by the Senate three months earlier but that required only certification that no senator's spouse would benefit from an earmark. Inclusion of Nelson's son, however, would be required if the ethics bill provision passes.
When the defense authorization bill came up last week, Coburn prepared amendments to eliminate the Nelson earmark and the most notorious earmark pending in Congress: Democratic Rep. John Murtha's proposed $23 million for the National Drug Intelligence Center in his Pennsylvania district. Reid's plan to satisfy antiwar activists with an all-night debate averted debate, for now, on those two earmarks.
Reid, the soft-spoken trial lawyer from Searchlight, Nev., has tended to suppress free expression in the World's Greatest Deliberative Body in his tumultuous 6 1/2 months as majority leader. Last week, he cut off an attempt by Sen. Arlen Specter, the veteran moderate Republican, to respond to him with an abruptness that I had not witnessed in a half-century of Senate watching. When Specter finally got the floor, he declared: "Nothing is done here until the majority leader decides to exercise his power to keep the Senate in all night on a meaningless, insulting session. . . . Last night's performance made us the laughingstock of the world." It may get worse if plans to eviscerate ethics legislation are pursued.
perm2gc
12-28 05:28 PM
Hi , My wife is on h4 visa and I want to file H1B for her and she has It experience of 3 years .Please guide whats the procedure .
Talk to your employer.He will give you full details. The process will be the same way as your H1B process.
Good Luck!!!
Talk to your employer.He will give you full details. The process will be the same way as your H1B process.
Good Luck!!!
upuaut8
10-31 02:00 AM
or using action script to place dots in a line, also works.
No comments:
Post a Comment