sks_2002
05-10 08:11 PM
Hi,
Can someone please recommend some good immigration lawyers in the Boston areas?
Thank you very much for the help
Hello Everybody,
Can someone please point me to a list of good immigration lawyers in the Boston area for the AC21?
Thanks for the help
Hello Everybody,
Can someone please send me a list of good immigration lawyers in the Boston area for AC21
Thank you very much
Can someone please recommend some good immigration lawyers in the Boston areas?
Thank you very much for the help
Hello Everybody,
Can someone please point me to a list of good immigration lawyers in the Boston area for the AC21?
Thanks for the help
Hello Everybody,
Can someone please send me a list of good immigration lawyers in the Boston area for AC21
Thank you very much
wallpaper The Justin Bieber appears to
ilikekilo
01-24 07:21 PM
nice gesture there
reddymjm
06-12 05:12 PM
My ead card production ordered. I efiled on April 27th.
Rediculous, the processing times say it takes 90 days minimum. hopefully they will give the extension from my expiry date which is Aug 28th 2008.
Rediculous, the processing times say it takes 90 days minimum. hopefully they will give the extension from my expiry date which is Aug 28th 2008.
2011 Justin Bieber Returns to CSI
crystal
01-28 02:09 PM
Is it ok to transfer H1b to different employer after using AP? I resumed work with same employer on H1b after entering with AP recently.
My H1b is valid till 2010 . H1b was last exteneded an year back, inside USA, before I left to India.
I am going to get info from lawyer, but I wanted to be sure..
I read some info from the link below, but still not clear
http://www.hooyou.com/advanceparole/h1bv-ap.html
My H1b is valid till 2010 . H1b was last exteneded an year back, inside USA, before I left to India.
I am going to get info from lawyer, but I wanted to be sure..
I read some info from the link below, but still not clear
http://www.hooyou.com/advanceparole/h1bv-ap.html
more...
Dilemma
09-13 01:45 AM
Discuss with attorney
gc28262
02-06 04:29 PM
Just need some suggestion:
.................................
so if i lose my job.. can i go to H4.. even though i have stayed here for more than 6 years..
If you have never been on H4, you can be on H4 for another 6 years.
H1B 6 year and H4 6 year have been decoupled. Please search murthy.com bulletins
.................................
so if i lose my job.. can i go to H4.. even though i have stayed here for more than 6 years..
If you have never been on H4, you can be on H4 for another 6 years.
H1B 6 year and H4 6 year have been decoupled. Please search murthy.com bulletins
more...
test101
07-10 10:09 AM
or it's something not going to be done? we need to work on this
2010 What did you think of Justin#39;s
nixstor
10-27 01:29 PM
Can you AC21 portability be used for more than one employer?
What if some one decides to stop working and go back to school?
What if some one decides to stop working and go back to school?
more...
devamanohar
08-14 09:06 PM
I filed for my self, wife and two daughters I-485 and EAD with all documents but without I-140 recipt notice instead I enclosed evidences of the cashed check, INS online status print out and cover letter with reciept number.
My application reached on July 2 at 11:34am. No reciept yet. I called INS and representative explained my case will not be denied. If at all, INS will ask for the reciept notice.
I have my reciept notice for I-140 now.
At this point shall I wait or apply one more today with the reciept notice.
My application reached on July 2 at 11:34am. No reciept yet. I called INS and representative explained my case will not be denied. If at all, INS will ask for the reciept notice.
I have my reciept notice for I-140 now.
At this point shall I wait or apply one more today with the reciept notice.
hair Justin Bieber to Film CSI
shah121
06-15 12:51 PM
Hello,
I am on H1 B and wife is on H4. H1B is expiring in Nov 2009 and my employer is going to file for extn. My wife is currently doing her Masters on H4. Need some advise to here
1) If I apply for extn (H1 & H4) within next 2 weeks it will take atleast another 3 months before I will come to know the decision. Nowadays lot of H1B extensions are getting rejected. Will it be a good idea to move my wife's status to F1 and not apply for her H4 extn..?
or
2) Should I wait for my decision on extension and if it gets rejected then apply for F1
or
3) Apply both i.e. apply for extension and simultaneously for H4 to F1. Any issues with this approach?
I don't have constraints on paying fees on H4 or F1. All I want is my wife should be able to continue her studies. I am working in an Indian company, so even if my extn gets rejected, I will go back to and continue work, but still want my wife to continue studies.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Shah
I am on H1 B and wife is on H4. H1B is expiring in Nov 2009 and my employer is going to file for extn. My wife is currently doing her Masters on H4. Need some advise to here
1) If I apply for extn (H1 & H4) within next 2 weeks it will take atleast another 3 months before I will come to know the decision. Nowadays lot of H1B extensions are getting rejected. Will it be a good idea to move my wife's status to F1 and not apply for her H4 extn..?
or
2) Should I wait for my decision on extension and if it gets rejected then apply for F1
or
3) Apply both i.e. apply for extension and simultaneously for H4 to F1. Any issues with this approach?
I don't have constraints on paying fees on H4 or F1. All I want is my wife should be able to continue her studies. I am working in an Indian company, so even if my extn gets rejected, I will go back to and continue work, but still want my wife to continue studies.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Shah
more...
Blog Feeds
10-28 09:00 AM
Many of you don't know that I put out a regular newsletter on immigration law. It's less opinion-oriented than the blog, but a good way to keep up on many developments in the field. Here's the link for this week's issue. And here is the table of contents: 1. Openers 2. ABCs of Immigration Law: H-2A Temporary Agricultural Visas 3. Ask Visalaw.com 4. Border and Enforcement News -ICE says no opt-out for local jurisdictions -Immigration audits of employers increase -Deportation of criminals increases -Authorities use social networking sites to detect immigration fraud -California border inspector accused of taking bribes -Napolitano...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/10/siskinds-immigration-bulletin-october-27-2010.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/10/siskinds-immigration-bulletin-october-27-2010.html)
hot Justin Bieber#39;s CSI: Crime
bulgarian
11-22 06:13 AM
Hey,
I'm sorry, I still don't have a solution, but I am working on it... I will write you if I come up with something.
Regards,
I'm sorry, I still don't have a solution, but I am working on it... I will write you if I come up with something.
Regards,
more...
house Justin Bieber CSI
aadimanav
09-24 01:10 PM
Scenario:
Working on H1. Wife is on H4. Waiting for our EADs.
Planning to work for H1-GC sponsorer employer until (or I should say 6 months after) we get the GC.
I am running a website and am planning to sell the advertising space?
Q1: Can a H1 legally receive the money from website advertising on his/her website?
Q2: Can a H1 register DBA?
Q3: How about if H1 uses EAD, can then he register DBA and legally receive the money from website advertising? (I know once you use EAD your H1 becomes invalid).
Q4: I know I can register DBA in wife's name when she receive EAD? Is that the only option I have?
Please share your thoughts!
TIA.
Working on H1. Wife is on H4. Waiting for our EADs.
Planning to work for H1-GC sponsorer employer until (or I should say 6 months after) we get the GC.
I am running a website and am planning to sell the advertising space?
Q1: Can a H1 legally receive the money from website advertising on his/her website?
Q2: Can a H1 register DBA?
Q3: How about if H1 uses EAD, can then he register DBA and legally receive the money from website advertising? (I know once you use EAD your H1 becomes invalid).
Q4: I know I can register DBA in wife's name when she receive EAD? Is that the only option I have?
Please share your thoughts!
TIA.
tattoo Justin Bieber taken to
user1984
08-09 09:43 PM
Today's Date: 09 Aug 2010
1)I graduated in masters in december 2008.Iam working on OPT extension which expires on june2,2011.Iam thinking to apply for H1.Accordint to current situation,can i submit H1 application after october 2010 also? as CAP will be still open for masters quota(hoping)?can i put start date immediate after my opt status expiry date or it will start only on conventional date oct1st of every year?
2) Iam planning to fly India in between mar 2011 -may 2011 for 1month...so if iam approved with H1(if above questions says yes) then i need to go to H1 stamping and when i enter US ...i need to change my status from opt to H1 right at US entry.
3) if iam going in apr/may 2011 when should i start the H1 processing?(it should be before 6months only)
1)I graduated in masters in december 2008.Iam working on OPT extension which expires on june2,2011.Iam thinking to apply for H1.Accordint to current situation,can i submit H1 application after october 2010 also? as CAP will be still open for masters quota(hoping)?can i put start date immediate after my opt status expiry date or it will start only on conventional date oct1st of every year?
2) Iam planning to fly India in between mar 2011 -may 2011 for 1month...so if iam approved with H1(if above questions says yes) then i need to go to H1 stamping and when i enter US ...i need to change my status from opt to H1 right at US entry.
3) if iam going in apr/may 2011 when should i start the H1 processing?(it should be before 6months only)
more...
pictures Justin Bieber was #39;kind of a
srisai122
12-30 04:06 AM
Company A filed my I-140 and it got approved, however I have not been provided with copy of the approval notice. I don't have the receipt number either. In this case, is it possible to obtain the copy of I-140 thru FOIA (Freedom of Information Act)?
Thank you for the help.
Thank you for the help.
dresses Was Justin Bieber shot?
InTheMoment
06-18 07:57 PM
2 (a) is only if you have an approved I-140. In your case write "Concurrent filing of I-140/I-485 based on NIW"
more...
makeup Justin Bieber and Marg
Macaca
10-30 08:54 PM
Honey, They Shrunk the Congress (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/opinion/30tues4.html) By ADAM COHEN | New York Times, October 30, 2007
President Bush�s nominee for attorney general, Michael Mukasey, was asked an important question about Congress�s power at his confirmation hearing. If witnesses claim executive privilege and refuse to respond to Congressional subpoenas in the United States attorneys scandal � as Karl Rove and Harriet Miers have done � and Congress holds them in contempt, would his Justice Department refer the matter to a grand jury for criminal prosecution, as federal law requires?
Mr. Mukasey suggested the answer would be no. That was hardly his only slap-down of Congress. He made the startling claim that a president can defy laws if he or she is acting within the authority �to defend the country.� That is a mighty large exception to the rule that Congress�s laws are supreme.
The founders wanted the �people�s branch� to be strong, but the Bush administration has usurped a frightening number of Congress�s powers � with very little resistance. The question is whether members of Congress of both parties will do anything about it.
Congress is often described as one of three coequal branches, but that is not entirely true. As Akhil Reed Amar, a Yale law professor, observed in �America�s Constitution: a Biography,� Article I actually makes Congress �first among equals, with wide power to structure the second-mentioned executive and third-mentioned judicial branches.�
Article I, which describes Congress�s powers, is the Constitution�s first, longest and most generously worded article. It gives Congress a wide array of specific powers, but also broad authority to pass laws that bring to life �all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.�
It would be hard to recognize that powerful Congress today. In part, that is because Congress has been unwilling or unable to enact laws on the most important issues facing the nation � Iraq, immigration reform, health care.
Just as troubling, though, is how it has allowed its institutional power to erode. President Bush has regularly issued signing statements � including on critical issues like the ban on torture � that assert his right to ignore new laws at the same time as he signs them. These signing statements are not just talk. A report by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office states that in nearly one-third of the cases it looked at, after President Bush issued a signing statement objecting to a provision of a new law, his administration did not implement it as written.
The Senate has routinely confirmed judicial nominees who make no secret of their belief that the president�s power should be sweeping, and Congress�s sharply cut back.
The Senate confirmed Jeffrey Sutton to a federal appeals court judgeship even though Patrick Leahy, now the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, observed that as a lawyer Mr. Sutton �aggressively sought out cases to limit the power of Congress to enact laws protecting individual rights.� It confirmed Janice Rogers Brown to the powerful United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit even though she had suggested that much of the legislation passed during the New Deal � including the Social Security Act � was unconstitutional.
There are things Congress can do. It can start by speaking out about the importance of Congressional power the way the administration has talked about deferring to the commander in chief. Congress should pass laws that support its own power � like a bipartisan one that Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, has introduced to nullify the impact of signing statements.
The Senate should refuse to confirm nominees who do not take Congressional power seriously. And Congress should make clear that if the executive branch will not enforce its subpoenas, it will use its own �inherent contempt� powers to do so.
Right now, standing up for Congress may appeal more to Democrats than Republicans. The issue of reining in presidential power is beginning to gain traction among conservatives, however, as they contemplate the possibility of a Democrat � particularly Hillary Clinton � as president.
Defending Congressional authority should not be a partisan issue. The founders wanted a strong Congress because they understood the importance of ensuring that the most democratic branch have a strong say in how the nation is run.
President Bush�s nominee for attorney general, Michael Mukasey, was asked an important question about Congress�s power at his confirmation hearing. If witnesses claim executive privilege and refuse to respond to Congressional subpoenas in the United States attorneys scandal � as Karl Rove and Harriet Miers have done � and Congress holds them in contempt, would his Justice Department refer the matter to a grand jury for criminal prosecution, as federal law requires?
Mr. Mukasey suggested the answer would be no. That was hardly his only slap-down of Congress. He made the startling claim that a president can defy laws if he or she is acting within the authority �to defend the country.� That is a mighty large exception to the rule that Congress�s laws are supreme.
The founders wanted the �people�s branch� to be strong, but the Bush administration has usurped a frightening number of Congress�s powers � with very little resistance. The question is whether members of Congress of both parties will do anything about it.
Congress is often described as one of three coequal branches, but that is not entirely true. As Akhil Reed Amar, a Yale law professor, observed in �America�s Constitution: a Biography,� Article I actually makes Congress �first among equals, with wide power to structure the second-mentioned executive and third-mentioned judicial branches.�
Article I, which describes Congress�s powers, is the Constitution�s first, longest and most generously worded article. It gives Congress a wide array of specific powers, but also broad authority to pass laws that bring to life �all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.�
It would be hard to recognize that powerful Congress today. In part, that is because Congress has been unwilling or unable to enact laws on the most important issues facing the nation � Iraq, immigration reform, health care.
Just as troubling, though, is how it has allowed its institutional power to erode. President Bush has regularly issued signing statements � including on critical issues like the ban on torture � that assert his right to ignore new laws at the same time as he signs them. These signing statements are not just talk. A report by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office states that in nearly one-third of the cases it looked at, after President Bush issued a signing statement objecting to a provision of a new law, his administration did not implement it as written.
The Senate has routinely confirmed judicial nominees who make no secret of their belief that the president�s power should be sweeping, and Congress�s sharply cut back.
The Senate confirmed Jeffrey Sutton to a federal appeals court judgeship even though Patrick Leahy, now the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, observed that as a lawyer Mr. Sutton �aggressively sought out cases to limit the power of Congress to enact laws protecting individual rights.� It confirmed Janice Rogers Brown to the powerful United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit even though she had suggested that much of the legislation passed during the New Deal � including the Social Security Act � was unconstitutional.
There are things Congress can do. It can start by speaking out about the importance of Congressional power the way the administration has talked about deferring to the commander in chief. Congress should pass laws that support its own power � like a bipartisan one that Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, has introduced to nullify the impact of signing statements.
The Senate should refuse to confirm nominees who do not take Congressional power seriously. And Congress should make clear that if the executive branch will not enforce its subpoenas, it will use its own �inherent contempt� powers to do so.
Right now, standing up for Congress may appeal more to Democrats than Republicans. The issue of reining in presidential power is beginning to gain traction among conservatives, however, as they contemplate the possibility of a Democrat � particularly Hillary Clinton � as president.
Defending Congressional authority should not be a partisan issue. The founders wanted a strong Congress because they understood the importance of ensuring that the most democratic branch have a strong say in how the nation is run.
girlfriend quot;CSI: Crime Scene
pansworld
07-09 09:44 PM
Greeting Cards :p
Now that we have media attention with USCIS we should start letting Congress know of our plight too. Vice President who I think is the chair of the senate and Nancy Pelosi, House Speaker.:D
Now that we have media attention with USCIS we should start letting Congress know of our plight too. Vice President who I think is the chair of the senate and Nancy Pelosi, House Speaker.:D
hairstyles From Justin Bieber.
indianabacklog
06-19 08:08 PM
do v need to print 325A form on coloured paper ?
This is not necessary. Curious what gave you this impression?
This is not necessary. Curious what gave you this impression?
kirupa
02-28 01:05 AM
Not any more. There are two other variants of that here: http://www.kirupa.com/forum/showthread.php?t=191350
:)
:)
voldemar
02-06 09:35 PM
My friend has his I-485 filed and has got EAD/AP, but the priority date is so behind, that he has no chance of getting a green card before his marriage. So, as I understand he should be able to bring his wife on H4 (as long as he maintains H1). My question is: does he have to re-file for I-485 to include his wife and if so will the priority date remain the same as the first application?She needs to file her own I-485 but only when PD become current. She has the same PD as primary applicant.
No comments:
Post a Comment